Lab scan versus CanoScan 9000F Mark 2

For several years I always rely on local lab to scan all my film  but lately after shooting using Kodak Portra 400, I've confront a  color issue on my scanned negative, the skin tone is like shit, then I bought myself Canon 9000F Mark 2 scanner and it will be the game changer for my analogue photography passion.Okay folks.....enjoy yourself by shooting film and try to find a good local lab to process your negative.

Mamiya 645 AFD + 80mm f/2.8N + Kodak Portra 400 + CanoScan 9000F Mark II @ 1200dpi

Shooting Acros The Universe!

As a film shooter, 80% of my work was in color, Ultramax 400 or Fuji Superia 400 X-tra for 35mm and Kodak Portra 400VC/ New Portra 400 or Fujicolor  Pro 160 NS for my medium format.For the black & white I'm shooting Ilford XP2 Super for both 35 and 120 format. I've started to collecting my old developing tank.....and ordering the chemical to test out the Fuji Neopan Acros 100 film and this is my first test roll  using Mamiya 645 Pro + Mamiya Sekor 80mm f/2.8.Mamiya 645 Pro l 80mm f/2.8 develop using Ilfosol 3, 1+9 for 5 minute 15 second , 30 second water stop bath and 4 minute fixed with cheap scanning from local lab.